Keywords
water birds
Shannon Diversity index
Threats factor
anthropogenic
Deepor Beel
How to Cite
Abstract
Study has been carried out to assess the water bird diversity in Deepor Beel Ramsar site of Assam from March 2007 to March 2010. Study revealed the presence of 39 species of water birds belonging to 16 families. The family Anatidae represented highest of eight species followed by seven species in the family Ardeidae whereas other 14 species represented by rest of the family. However, there were marked variation of species abundance in different years of study, of which, the family Anatidae represented the highest abundant family throughout the study period. The analysis of species diversity index using Shannon diversity index showed that the diversity was highest during 3rd year study period. Study also highlighted the threat factors prevailing in the Deepor Beel Ramsar Site
References
Ali S and Ripley SD. 1983. Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan. Oxford Univ. Press 48-49.
Barman R and Saikia SJ. 1995. Length-Weight Relationship and Some Ecological Observation of Cirrhina reba (Ham.) from the Wetlands of Assam, India. Environ. and Ecol., 13(3):721-724.
Berthold P and Francisco P. 1994. Heritability of migratory activity in a natural bird population. The Royal society, Proceedings: Biological sciences 257(1350):311-315.
Bera SK, Dixit S, Basumatary SK and Gogoi R. 2008. Evidence of biological degradation in sediments of Deepor Beel Ramsar Site, Assam as inferred by degraded palynomorphs and fungal remains. Current science 178(2):178-180.
Bharatha Lakshmi B. 2006. Avifauna of Gosthani estuary near Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. J. Natcon., 18(2):291-304.
Burger J. 1985. Habitat Selection in Temperate Marsh-Nesting Birds. In: (Eds) Cody M.L. Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, Orlando 253- 281.
Canterbury GE, Martin TE, Petit DR, Petot LJ and Branford DF. 1999. Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring. Conserv. Bio., 14:544-558.
Caziani SM and Derlindati EJ. 2000. Abundance and habitat of High Andean flamingos in Northwestern Argentina. Waterbirds 23 (Special Publication 1):121-133.
Choudhury AU. 2000. The Birds of Assam. Gauhati: Gibbon Books and World Wide Fund for Nature 240.
Cody ML. 1981. Habitat selection in birds: The role of vegetation structure, competitors and productivity. Bioscience 31:107-113.
Colwell MA and Dodd SL. 1997. Environmental and habitat correlates of pasture use by nonbreeding shorebirds. Condor 99:337-344.
Farmer AH and Parent AH. 1997. Effects of the landscape on shorebird movements at spring migration stopovers. Condor 99:698-707.
Deka SK and Goswami DC.1992. Hydrology, Sediment Characteristics and Depositional Environment of Wetlands: A case study of Deepor Beel, Assam. J. of Assam Scien. Socie., 34(2):62- 84.
García Borboroglu P and Yorio P. 2007. Breeding habitat requirements and selection by Olrog’s Gull (Larus atlanticus) a threatened species. Auk 124:1201-1212.
Gill FB. 1994. Ornithology. 2nd edition, New York.
Grimmett R, C Inskipp and Inskipp T.1999. Pocket guide to the Birds of Indian Sub- Continent. Oxford Univ. Press 384.
Horn KV, Benton K and Gatti. 2008. Waterfowl Breeding Population Survey for Wisconsin, 1973- 2007. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Madison Wisconsin.
Houdkova B. 2003. Trends in numbers of Coot (Fulica atra) in Czech Republic in 1998-2000. Ornis Hungarica 12-13:283-288
Karr JR and Roth RR. 1971. Vegetation structure and avian diversity in several new world areas. Am. Naturalist 105: 423-435.
Korschgen CE and Dahlgren RB. 1992. Human Disturbance of Waterfowl: Causes, Effects and Managements: In Management Hand Book, Fish and Wildlife Leaflet 1-7.
Kirsten S and Brander L. 2004. The Economic Values of the World’s Wetlands. Living Waters, Amsterdam.
Lebedeva NV and Markitan LV. 2001. Problems of Population dynamics of White-Eyed Pochard (Aythya nyroca Guld., 1770) in the Eastern sea of Azov region. Russian J. of Ecology 32:425-431.
Lee P and Rotenberry JT. 2005. Relationships between bird species and tree species assemblages in forested habitats of eastern North America. J. of Biogeography 32:1139-1150.
Macdonald KB. 1977. Plant and Animal Communities of Pacific North American Salt Marshes. Wet Coastal Ecosystems (Eds) Chapman, V.J. Elsevier Scientific Publication Co., Amsterdam.
Mineau P, Sheenan PJ and Baril A. 1990. Pesticide and waterfowl on the Canadian Prairies, need for research and monitoring.IWRB.Tech. Pub. U.K. 133-134.
Paracuellos M. 2006. How can habitat selection affect the use of a wetland complex by water birds. Bio. and Conserv., 15:4569-4582.
Phillips JH. 2008. Decline of the Pintail-Part II, MadDuk- The Conscience of Waterfowl Conservation. .
Puttick GM. 1984. Foraging and Activity Patterns in Wintering Shorebirds. Behavior of Marine Animals, Shorebirds: Migration and Foraging Behaviour (Eds) Burger J and BL Olla. Plenum Press, New York, London.1-7.
Soderstrom, B and Part T.1999. Influence of landscape on farmland bird breeding in seminatural pastures. Conserv. Bio., 14:522-533.
Smith RL. 1992. Elements of Ecology. 3rd edition. Harper Collins Publishers Ltd. London.
Saikia PK and Bhattacharjee PC. 1987. A study of the Avifauna of Deepor Beel a Potential Bird Sanctuary in Assam. Wetland and Waterfowl Conservation in Asia (Eds) Parisah, D. and Prentice, R. C. Asian Wetland Bureau/ International Waterfowl & Wetlands Research Bureau, Kuala Lumpur. 52:188-195.
Saikia PK. 2005. Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Lower and Higher Organisms and Their Functional role in the Deepor Beel Ecosystem. Funded by North Eastern Space Applications Centre, Department of Space, Government of India, Umium, Meghalaya, Shillong 1-97.
Saikia PK and Kakati M. 2010. Biodiversity in Deepor Beel Ramsar Site of Assam India: Faunal Diversity. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing 132.
Smith RL. 1992. Elements of Ecology. 3rd edition. Harper Collins Publishers Ltd, London.
Solow AR. 1993. A simple test for change in community structure. J.of Animal Eco., 62:191-193.
Vaisanen RA and Solonen T. 1996. Summary: Population Trends of 100 Winter Bird Species in Finland in 1957-1996. Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Finland. 70-97.
Verner J. 1985.Assessment of counting techniques. Current ornithol., 2:247-302.
Weller NW. 1978. Management of Freshwater Marshes for Wildlife. Fresh Water Wetlands. Ecological Processes and Management Potential (Eds) R. E. Good, D.F. Whigham and R.L. Simpson. Academic Press, New York. 267-284.
Wen X, Yang L and Yang X. 1995. Status of waterbirds in wetlands of Yunnan plateau, China (Eds) Y. Chen Study of Wetlands in China. Jilin Science Technology Press, Chang Chun. 248-255.
Wiens JA. 1989. The Ecology of the Bird’s Communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2):8-9.
Zakaria M, Rajpar MN and Sajap AS. 2009. Species diversity and feeding guilds of birds in Paya Indah wetland reserve, peninsular Malaysia. International J. of Zoological Research 5(3):83-100.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.