Journal of Research in Biology Biology Journal Journal of Biology Biology research journal biomedical journal
Feasible use of rock oyster (Crassostrea commercialis) and seaweeds (Gracilaria salicornia and Caulerpa lentillife) as biofilter in a laboratory - scale closed recirculating system for juveniles spotted babylon (Babylonia areolata)
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Seaweed
biofilter
recirculating culture
water quality
Gracilaria salicornia
Caulerpa lentillifera
Babylonia areolata

How to Cite

Chaitanawisuti, N., Santhaweesuk, W., & Kritsanapuntu, S. (2011). Feasible use of rock oyster (Crassostrea commercialis) and seaweeds (Gracilaria salicornia and Caulerpa lentillife) as biofilter in a laboratory - scale closed recirculating system for juveniles spotted babylon (Babylonia areolata). Journal of Research in Biology, 1(5), 370-375. Retrieved from https://ojs.jresearchbiology.com/index.php/jrb/article/view/108

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the feasible use of rock oyster (Crassostrea commercialis) in biofiltration and two seaweeds (Gracilaria salicornia and Caulerpa lentillife) as nutrient absorbant in a laboratory - scale recirculating system for growing of juveniles spotted babylon (Babylonia areolata). The experiment was carried out in triplicates over a period of 90 days. The experiment was a complete randomized design with three growth trials: Treatments 1: without oyster and seaweed biofilter used as a control; Treatment 2: Oyster biofiltration (1,500 g per tank) and seaweed (G. salicornia) absorption (250 g per tank); and Treatment 3: Oyster biofiltration (1,500 g per tank) and seaweed (C. lentillife)absorption (250 g per tank). No significant differences (P>0.05) in final shell length, final body weight, body weight gains, shell length increment and growth rate among all treatments. Growth rate in shell length and body weight of spotted babylon ranged from 0.33 – 0.34 cm mo-1 and 0.62 – 0.67 g mo-1, respectively. Significant differences (P<0.05) in final survival rate of spotted babylon were found among treatments, ranging from 86.72 to 86.98 % compared with those of the control (84.27%). There were no significant differences (P>0.05) in water temperature, salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen, ammonia-nitrogen, nitrite-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen and phosphate-phosphorus among the growth trials but not for alkalinity. This study can conclude that G. salicorni and C. lentillifera can be used as nutrient biofilter for regulating of water quality in a closed recirculating system for growing juveniles spotted babylon but not suitable on using oyster.

PDF
HTML

References

APHA, AWWA, WPCF. 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, 20th ed. Water Pollution Control Federation: Washington, DC. 2-24-4-159.

Buschmann AH. 1996. An introduction to integrated farming and the use of seaweeds as biofilters. Hydrobiologia 326(327):59-60.

Chaitanawisuti N, Krisanapuntu S, Natsukari Y. 2005. Growth of hatchery-reared juvenile spotted babylon (Babylonia areolata Link 1807) to marketable size at four stocking densities in flowthrough and recirculating seawater system. Aquaculture International 13:233-239.

Chow FY, Macchivello J, Santa Cruz S, Fonck E. 2001. Utilization of Gracilaria chilensis (Rhodophyta: Gracilariaceae) as a biofilter in the depuration of effluents from tank cultures of fish, oysters and sea urchin. Journal of World Aquaculture Society 32:215-219.

Hernandez I, Martinez-Aragon JF, Tovar A, Perez -llorens JL and Vergara JJ. 2002. Biofiltering efficiency in removal dissolved nutrients by three species of estuarine macroalgae cultivated with sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) waste waters 2 Ammonia. Journal Applied Phycology 14:375-384.

Jones AB, Dennison WC, and Preston NP. 2001. Integrated treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation, oyster filtration and macroalgal absorption: a laboratory scale study. Aquaculture 193:155-178.

Martinez-Aragon JF, Hernandez I, Perez-llorens JL, Vazquez R, Vergara JJ. 2002. Biofiltering efficiency in removal dissolved nutrients by three species of estuarine macroalgae cultivated with sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) waste waters 1 Phosphate. Journal Applied Phycology 14:365-374.

Msuya FE, Kyewalyanga MS, and Salum D. 2006. The performance of the seaweed Ulva reticulate as a biofilter in a low-tech, low cost, gravity generated water flow regime in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Aquaculture 254:284-292.

Neori A, Krom MD, Ellner SP, Boyd CE, Popper D, Rabinovitch R, Davison PJ, Dvir O, Zuber D, Ucko M, Angel D, and Gordin H 1996. Seaweed biofilters as regulators of water quality in integrated fish-seaweed culture unit. Aquaculture 141:183-199.

Pagand P, Blancheton JP, Lemoalle J, and Casellas C. 2000. The use of high rate algal ponds for the treatment of marine effluent from a recirculating fish rearing system. Aquaculture Research 31:729-736.

Paul NA, and de Nys R. 2008. Promise and pitfalls of locally abundance seaweeds as biofilters for integrated aquaculture. Aquaculture 281:49-55.

Wang H, Liu CF, Qin CX, Cao SQ, and Ding J. 2007. Using a macroalgae Ulva pertura biofilter in a recirculating system for production of juvenile sea cucumber Apostichopus japonica. Aquaculture Engineering 36:217-224

Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below

Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?

You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

for any purpose, even commercially.

This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]

Under the following terms:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.