Journal of Research in Biology Biology Journal Journal of Biology Biology research journal biomedical journal
Variation in air pollution tolerance index and anticipated performance index of plants near a sugar factory: implications for landscape-plant species selection for industrial areas
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Air pollution tolerance index (APTI)
Leaf-extract pH
Leaf total chlorophyll
Ascorbic acid
Leaf relative water content
Anticipated Performance Index (API)
biological parameters

How to Cite

MA, S., & D, S. T. (2011). Variation in air pollution tolerance index and anticipated performance index of plants near a sugar factory: implications for landscape-plant species selection for industrial areas. Journal of Research in Biology, 1(7), 494-502. Retrieved from https://ojs.jresearchbiology.com/index.php/jrb/article/view/132

Abstract

Air pollution tolerance index (APTI) is used to select plant species which are tolerant to air pollution. Four biochemical parameters such as leaf relative water content (RWC), ascorbic acid (AA) content, total leaf chlorophyll (TCh), and leaf extract pH were used to develop an APTI. Five tree species growing near a sugar mill, an air pollution point source, were collected during six months from October, 2010 to March, 2011. The data suggested that combining a variety of biochemical parameters could give a more reliable result than those air pollution tolerance classifications based on a single biochemical parameter. High values of APTI were recorded in Ficus religiosa (44.39) and Ficus benghalensis (42.38). The order of tolerance is given as: Ficus religiosa > Ficus benghalensis > Pongamia pinnata > Delonix regia > Azadirachta indica. The percentage increase in APTI was maximum for Delonix regia (69.22%) and minimum for Ficus benghalensis (18.33%) when compared to control site. The Anticipated Performance Index (API) of these tree species were also calculated by considering their APTI values together with other socio-economic and biological parameters. According to API, the most tolerant plant species were Ficus religiosa (100%) and Ficus benghalensis (100%) whereas the species with poor tolerance were Delonix regia and Azadirachta indica. The APTI and API of species indicated an ideal candidate for landscape planting in the vicinity of polluting industry

PDF
HTML

References

Abida Begum and Ramaiah Harikrishna M. 2010. Evaluation of some tree species to absorb air pollutants in three industrial locations of South Bengaluru, India, E-Journals of Chemistry 7 (S1):S151-S156.

Abida Begum, Ramaiah Harikrishna M, Irfanulla Khan and Veena K. 2009. Analysis of Heavy metals concentration in Soil and Litchens from Various localities of Hosur Road”, E-Journals of Chemistry 6(1):13-22.

Agarwal SK. 1986. A new distributional function of foliar phenol concentration in the evaluation of plants for their air pollution tolerance index. Acta Ecol., 8(2)29-36.

Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris, Plant Physiol., 24:1-15.

Bevan. 1971. The disposal of sugar mills effluents in Queensland, 40th proceeding of the T. S. S. C.T. Louisinia October-November. 150:H-1516.

Bhatia SC. 2006. Environmental Chemistry CBS publishers and Distributors.

Bhattacharya AK. 1983. Effects of Sulphur dioxide on plants, Post-Doctoral Research Project Report (Unpublished) (Jawarlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India),

Chaudhary CS, Rao DN. 1977. A study of some factors in plants controlling their susceptibility to SO2 pollution. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy 43:236-241.

CPCB. 1999-2000. Guidelines for developing greenbelts, CPCB Publication Programme Objective Series. PROBES/75.

Dali Mondal, Srimanta Gupta and Jayanta Kumar Dutta. 2011. Anticipated performance index of some tree species considered for green belt development in an urban area, Inter. Res. J. of Plant Science 2(4):99-106.

Dedio W. 1975. Water Relations in wheat leaves as screening test for drought Resistance. Can. J. Plant Sci., 369-378.

Dohmen GP, Koppers A, Langebartels C. 1990. Biochemical response of Norway Spruce (Piceaabies (L.) Karst.) towards 14-month exposure to ozone and acid mist: effects on amino acid, glutathione and polyamine titers, Environmental Pollution 64:375-383.

Escobedo FJ, Wagner JE, Nowak DJ. 2008. Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile’s policy of using urban forests to improve air quality, Journal of Environmental Management 86148-157.

Flowers MD, Fiscus EL, Burkey KO. 2007. Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and yield of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) genotype differing in sensitivity to Ozone. Environ. Exp. Bot., 61:190-198.

Han Y, Wang QY, Han GX. 1995. The analysis about SOD activities in leaves of plants and resistance classification of them. J. Liaoning Univ. (natural science edition) 22:71.

Hendrickson. 1971. New sugar factory waste and their control 40th proceeding of the T. S. S. C. T. October-November. 1552-1559.

Henry GJ, Heinke GW. 2005. Environmental Science Engineering. Second Edition Prentice –Hall of India Private Limited New Delhi.

Hoque MA, Banu MNA, Okuma E. 2007. Exogenous proline and glycinebetaine increase NaCl-induced ascorbate –glutathione cycle enzymes activities, and praline improves salt tolerance more than glycinebetaine in tobacco bright yellow -2 suspension – cultured cells. J.plant physiol., 164:1457-1468.

Hove LWA, Bossen ME, Bok FAM. 1999. The uptake of O3 by poplar leaves: The impact of a long -term exposure to low O3-concentrations, Atmospheric Environment 33:907-917.

Joshi OP, Pawar K and Wagela DK. 1993. Air quality monitoring of Indore city with special reference to SO2 and tree barks pH. J Environ Biol., 14(2):157-162.

Joshi PC and Chauhan A. 2008. Performance of locally grown rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) exposed to air pollutants in rapidly growing industrial area of district Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India. Life Science Journal 5(3):57-61.

Jyothi JS and Jaya. 2010. Evaluation of air pollution tolerance index index of selected plant species along roadsides in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. J. Environ. Biol., 31:379-386.

Kagamimori S, Okada A, Sato T, Kato T, Kawano S. 1978. A plant indicator of air pollution and human health in Japanese rural communities. Environ Res., 17(1):33-45.

Keller T, Schwager H. 1977. Air pollution and ascorbic acid. Eur J Forestry Pathol., 7:338-350.

Khan FI, Abbasi SA. 2002. Design of greenbelt for an industrial complex based on mathematical modeling. Environ Technol., 23(7):799-811.

Khwaja Mahmood A and Quraishi Masood H. 2003. Self-Monitoring and Reporting for Industry Islamabad: Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI).

Klump G, Furlan CM, Domingos M. 2000. Response of stress indicators and growth parameters of tibouchina pulchra logn. Exposed to air and soil pollution near the industrial complex of cubatao, Brazil. Sci. Total Environ., 246:79-91.

Lima JS, Fernandes EB and Fawcett WN. 2000. Mangifera indica and Phaseolus vulgaris in the bioindicator of air pollution in Bahia, Brazil, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 46(3):275-278.

Pierre M and Queiroz Q. 1981. Enzymic and metabolic changes in bean leaves during continuous pollution by necrotic level of SO2, Environ. Pollut., 25:41-51.

Rao DN, Leblanc F. 1966. Effect of SO2 on the lichen, algae with special reference to chlorophyll. Biologist., 69:69-95.

Rao CS. 2006. Environmental pollution control engineering. New age international publishers. Revised second edition. Rao DN. 1979. Plant leaf as pollution monitoring Device. Fertilizer News 25-28.

Sanjay K. Solomon. 2005. Environmental pollution and its management in Sugar industry in India: An Appraisal, Sugar Tech., 7(1):77-81.

Sarala Thambavani D, Sabitha MA and Selvasundari R. 2009. Air Pollution Tolerance Index of tree species growing in traffic area of Madurai, Tamil Nadu, The Asian Journal of Experimental Chemistry 4(1&2):126-132.

Sen, DN and Bhandari MC. 1978. Ecological and water relation to two Citrullus spp. In: Althawadi, A.M. (Ed.), Indian Arid Zone, Environ Physiol Ecol Plants 203-228.

Singh SK, Rao DN. 1983. Evaluation of plants for their tolerance to air pollution.” In: Proceedings Symposium on Air Pollution Control, (Indian Association for Air Pollution Control, New Delhi, India), 1:218-224.

Singh SK, Rao DN, Agrawal M, Pandey J, Narayan. 1991. Air Pollution Tolerance Index of Plants. J. Environ. Manag., 32:45-55.

Sodhi GS. 2005. Fundamental concepts of environmental chemistry. Second edition,

Steubing L, Fangmeier A, Both R. 1989. Effects of SO2, NO2, and O3 on population development and morphological and physiological parameters of native herb layer species in a beech forest, Environmental Pollution 58:281-302.

Tripathi AK, Gautam M. 2007. Biochemical parameters of plant as indicators of air pollution, Journal of Environ.Biol., 28(1):127-132.

Turk R and Wirth V. 1975. The pH dependence of SO2 damage to lichens, Oecologia 19:285-291.

Yan-Ju, Hui D. 2008. Variation in air pollution tolerance index of plants near a steel factory, implications for landscape-plant species selection for industrial areas. Environ. Dev., 1(4):24-30.

Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below

Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?

You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

for any purpose, even commercially.

This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]

Under the following terms:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.