Abstract
The present work aims to study the zooplankton distribution and abundance in Muttukadu backwater, Chennai, East coast of India from December 2008 to May 2010. We have recorded 46 species of which, 31 species belongs to copepoda, 9 species belongs to Rotifera, 2 species belongs to Ostracoda, four species of Cladocera. Among zooplankton, particularly Rotifera was the dominant group throughout the study period and highest count was recorded in the month of January, 2008. Percentage composition and Shannon diversity index is also presented for zooplankton community.
References
Achuthankutty CT, Madhupratap M, Nair VR, Nair SRS, Rao TSS. 1980. Zooplankton biomass and composition in the western Bay of Bengal during late Southwest monsoon. Indian J. Mar. Sci., 9: 201-206.
Ashok Prabu V, Perumal P, Rajkumar M. 2005. Diversity of microzooplankton in Parangipettai coastal waters, Southeast coast of India. J., Mar. Biol. Ass. Ind., 47:14-19.
Battish SK. 1992. Freshwater zooplankton of India. Oxford and IBH Publ. Co. Pvt. Ltd. 1-114.
Bharathi Devi NS, Ramanibai R. 2010. Oithona brevicornis (Copepoda: Cyclopoida): a Scanning electron microscopy study. Current Biotica. 4(3).
Cairns J, Mc Cormick PV, Niederlehner BR. 1993. A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia 263:1-44.
Chandramohan P, Raman AVR, Sreenivas N. 1999. Distribution of zooplankton in relation to water movements in Kakinada Bay, East coast of India. Ind. J. Mar. Sci., 28:192-197.
Chitra J, Ramanibai R. 2008. Studies on copepod community and their abundance at Muttukadu Backwater, Tamilnadu. Journal of Environment and Sociobiology 5(2).
Chitra. J, Ramanibai R. 2009. Intense bloom of a seaweed Centroceras clavulatum (Ceramiaceae) in the Muttukadu backwaters: a case study. Globec International News letter. Plymouth U.K. 8-9.
Chitra. J, Ramanibai R. 2008. Seasonal abundance and various stages of Pseudodiaptomus annandalei [copepod-calanoida] in Muttukadu backwater, Tamilnadu. Globec International Newsletter, Plymouth U.K. 3-5.
Chitra J, Ramanibai R. 2006. Sea Nettles (Chrysaora quinquecirrha) from Muttukadu Backwater, Chennai, Bay of Bengal. Globec International Newsletter: Plymouth U.K. 26.
Edmondson WT. 1959. Freshwater Biology, II edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York. 420-494.
Elayaraja P, Ramanibai R. 2006. Abundance and diversity of plankton in Pulicat lake. Seshaiyana 14 (1):3- 4.
Elayaraja P, Ramanibai R. 2008. Plankton occurrence in relation to nutrient concentration in estuaries along the east coast of Tamilnadu, India. Globec International News letter. Plymouth U.K. 70-73.
Eswari YNK, Ramanibai R. 2004. Estuarine copepod abundance and diversity in relation to environmental variables, southeast coast of India. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. India. 46:10-20.
Godhantaraman N. 2001. Seasonal variations in taxonomic composition, abundance and food web relationship of microzooplankton in estuarine and mangrove waters, Parangipettai region, Southeast coast of India. Ind. J. Mar. Sci., 30: 151-160.
Hansen FC, Mollmann C, Schotz U, Hinrichmen HH. 2004. Spatio–temporal distribution of Oithona similis in Bornholm Basin (Central Baltic Sea). J., Plankton Res., 26:378-382.
Kasturirangan LR. 1963. A key for the identification of the more common planktonic copepods of Indian coastal waters. Council of Scientific Industrial Research 2:1-87.
Landa GG, Barbosa FAR, Rietzler AC, Maia Barbosa PM. 2007. Thermocyclops decipiens (Kiefer, 1929) (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) as indicator of water quality in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 50(4):695-705.
Nair SR, Nair VR, Achuthankutty CT, Madhupratap M. 1981. Zooplankton composition and diversity in western Bay of Bengal. J., Plankton Res., 3:493-508.
Newell GE, Newell RC. 1977. Marine plankton–A practical guide. Hutchinson and Co. (Publ.) Ltd., London. 1-244.
Prema M, Subramaniam B. 2003. Hydrobiological parameters of Muttukadu backwater of Bay of Bengal. Indian Hydrobiology 6(1 & 2):95-100.
Perumal VN, Rajkumar M, Perumal P, Thillai Rajasekar K. 2009. Seasonal Variations of plankton diversity in the kaduviyar estuary, Nagapattinam, southeast coast of India. Journal of Environmental Biology 30(6):1035-1046.
Pinel-Alloul B. 1995. Les inverte´bre´s pre´dateurs du zooplancton. In Pourriot R and Meybeck M (eds), Limnologie Ge´ne´rale. Masson. Collection d’Ecologie, Paris 541-564.
Rakhesh. M, Raman AV, Sudarsan D. 2006. Discriminating zooplankton assemblages in neritic and oceanic waters: a case for the Northeast coast of India, Bay of Bengal. Mar. Environ. Res., 61:93-109.
Reghunath R, Sreedhara Murthy TR, Md. Hussain SK. 1999. Distribution of ostracods in the inner shelf sediments off Kasargod, South west coast of India. Ind. J. Mar. Sci., 28:302-306.
Santhanam R, Velayutham P, Jegathesan G. 1989. A manual of fresh water ecology. Daya Publ. House. New Delhi. 1-125.
Sharma BK, Michael RG. 1980. Synopsis of taxonomic study on Indian Rotatoria. Hydrobiol., 73:229 -239.
Victor R and Fernando CH. 1979. The Fresh Water Ostracods Crustacea: Ostracoda of India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 74(2):147-242.
Webber M, Edwards E, Myers C and Webber D. 2005. Phytoplankton and zooplankton as indicators of water quality in Discovery Bay, Jamaica. Hydrobiologia 545:177-193.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.