Journal of Research in Biology Biology Journal Journal of Biology Biology research journal biomedical journal
Investigation of the resistances of some verities of rose flower to Tetranychus urticae Koch and Tetranychus cinnabarinus mites under different fertilizers
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Antixenosis
life table
Nitrogenous fertilizer
Rose cultivars
Tetranychus urticae

How to Cite

Namdari, R., Shoushtari, R. V., Goldasteh, S., & Jahanshir Shakarami. (2019). Investigation of the resistances of some verities of rose flower to Tetranychus urticae Koch and Tetranychus cinnabarinus mites under different fertilizers . Journal of Research in Biology, 1(1), 2706-2719. Retrieved from https://ojs.jresearchbiology.com/index.php/jrb/article/view/206

Abstract

It is well known that fertilizers increase density of mites and on the other hand farmers use fertilizers for increase in quality and quantity of products. The use of some varieties may be suitable choice for resistance to mites in plants reared with fertilizers. This study was conducted to investigation investigate the resistance of some rose cultivar to mites such as Tetranychus urticae Koch and Tetranychus cinnabarinus at different fertilizer levels under greenhouse condition. The commercial rose cultivars viz., Dolce Vita (DV), Polar Star (PS) and Magic Red (MR), were investigated. These cultivars were fertilized with iron and nitrogenous fertilizers. We have checked the resistance with a number of mature mites, immature mites and eggs. Also antibiosis, antixenosis, life and productivity parameters were examined for these cultivars. Our findings showed that fertilizers increase density of mites, especially on MR cultivar. On the other hand, life and productivity parameters of mites were higher for MR cultivar and were lower for DV cultivar. The DV cultivar had the highest antibiosis and antixenosis resistances. Thus mites prefer MR cultivar and it can be stated that DV cultivar is a suitable cultivar for integrated pest management program.

PDF
HTML

References

Etienne Adango, Alexis Onzo, Rachid Hanna, Pierre Atachi and Braima James. 2006. Comparative demography of thespider mite, Tetranychus ludeni, on two host plants in West Africa. Journal Insect Science, 6(49): 1536-1545.

Ahmadi M, Fathipour Y and Kamali K. 2007. Population growth parameters of two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on different bean cultivars. Journal of Iranian Entomological Society, 22: 1-10.

Barbour JD, Farrar RR, Kennedy GG. 1991. Interaction of fertilizer regime with host plant resistance in tomato. Entomologia Experimentails et Applicata, 60(3): 289-300.

Bernays EA. 1990. Insect-plant Interactions VII. Florida: CRC Press. 176 P.

Birch LC. 1948. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. Journal of Animal Ecology 17(1): 15-26.

Carey JR. 1993. Applied demography for biologist with special emphasis on insects. U.K. Oxford University Press. 222 Ps

Conway GR. 1997. The doubly green revolution: Food for all in the 21st Century. New York: Cornell University Press. 352 P.

Conway GR and Pretty JN. 1991. Unwelcome harvest: agriculture and pollution. London: Earth scan Publications Ltd, 672 P.

Horn WAH. 1992. Micropropagation of rose (Rosa L.). In: Bajaj Y.P.S. (ed.) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, Springer, Berlin, 20: 320–342.

Khalilmanesh B. 1972. Fauna of mites of Iran. Journal of pest and disease plants, 35: 30-38.

Cemal Kibritci and Cengiz Kazak. 2004. Population development of Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisd. (Acarina: Tetranychidae) on various strawberry cultivars under greenhouse conditions in Adana-Turkey. Phytophaga, 14: 533-539.

Kim CK, Chung JD, Jee SO and Oh JY. (2003). Somatic embryogenesis from in vitro grown leaf explants of Rosa hybrid L. Journal of Plant Biotechnology, 5(3):169-172.

Krips OE, Witul A, Willems PEL and Dicke M. 1998. Intrinsic rate of population increase of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae on the ornamental crop gerbera: intraspecific variation in host plant and herbivore. Entomologia Experimentails et Applicata, 89(20):159-168

Maia AHN Ade H, Luiz AJB and Campanhola C. 2000. Statistical inference on associated fertility life table parameters using jackknife technique: computational aspects. Journal of Economic Entomology, 93(2): 511-518.

Joseph S Meyer, Christopher G Ingersoll, Lyman L, McDonald and Marks S Boyce. 1986. Estimating uncertainly in population growth rates: jackknife vs. bootstrap techniques. Ecology, 67(5): 1156-1166.

ModarresNajafabadi SS. 2012. Resistance to Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 11(6): 690-701.

Zahra MojibHaghghadam and Masoud Arbabi. 2012. Study of Mites' fauna and their natural enemies on the ornamental plants in greenhouses of Guilan and West Mazandaran province. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Science, 4 (11): 674-679.

Pedigo LP. 1999. Entomology and pest management. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey, USA. 646 P.

Pietrosiuk A, Furmanowa M, Kropczysnka D, KawkaB and Wiedenfeld H. 2003. Life history parameters of the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) feeding on bean leaves treated with pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 23(3): 187-190.

Razmjou J, Vorburger C, TavakkoliH and Fallahi A. 2009. Comparative population growth parameters of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), on different common bean cultivars. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 14(2): 83-90.

Sabelis MW. 1991. Life-history evolution of spider mites. In: Schuster R and Murphy PW. (eds.). The acari reproduction, development and life-history strategies. London, Chapman and Hall, 23-49 P.

Simpson SJ and Simpson CL. 1990. The mechanisms of nutritional compensation by phytophagous insects. In: Bernays EA .Insect-plant Interactions, New York: CPC Press, Inc. 2: 111-160.

Skorupska A. 2004. Resistance of apple cultivars tospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina, Tetranychidae) Part II. Infeluence of leafepubescence of selected apple cultivars on fecundityof two-spotted spider mite. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 44(1): 69-74.

Southwood TRE. 1973. The insect/plant relationship – an evolutionary perspective. In: Emden FV. Insect-plant relationship. Symposia of the Royal Entomological Society of London. No 6. Oxford: Blackwell, 3-30.

James H Tsai and Jin-Jun Wang. 2001. Effect of host plants on biology and life table parameters of Aphisspiraecola. Environmental Entomology, 30(1): 44-50.

Uckan F and Ergin E. 2002. Effect of host diet on the immature developmental time, fecundity, sex ratio, adult longevity and body size of Apanteles galleriae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Environmental Entomology, 31(1): 168-171.

Van Emden HF. 1997. Host plant resistance to insect pests. In: D Pimentel (ed.) Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Use. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 129-152 P.

Dana L, Wrensch and SSY Young. 1978. Effect of density and host quality on rate of development, survivorship and sex-ratio in carmine spider mite. Environmental Entomology, 7: 499-501.

Zalom FG, Phillips PA and Toscano NC. 1991. UC IPM pest management guidelines: Strawberry, insects and mites. http://www.ento.vt.edu/Fruitfiles/Strw2Spotted.html

Zhang ZJ, Wu QJ, Li XF, Zhang YJ, Xu BY and Zhu GR. 2007. Life history of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysan, Thripidae), on five different vegetable leaves. Journal of Applied Entomology, 131(5): 347-354.

Zhang ZQ. 2003. Mites of greenhouses, Identification biology and control the natural history museum, London, UK.CBAI pub. 244 P.

Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below

Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?

You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

for any purpose, even commercially.

This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]

Under the following terms:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.