Abstract
In this research, seeds of tomato were irradiated by ion beam or treated with ion beam and soybean DNA, and some tomato mutants with morphological variations were analyzed. Protein analysis in the leaves of mutants showed, changes of protein pattern in mutants were different as compared with the control, the main variation of protein pattern were darkening of bands, increase of protein bands were detected in mutant 12, mutant 14 and mutant 15 and lose of a band in mutant 15. Genomic DNA of mutants were analyzed by RAPD, and total number of amplification bands, number of differential bands and rate of differential bands were studied among mutants. Compared with the control, rate of differential bands was 100.0 % in mutant 9 and 15, also high in mutant 14 and 12, but was 20.0-50.0 % in other mutants except for mutant 3 and 11 without differential bands. In addition, content of vitamin C, soluble saccharide and protein were different, and fruit quality was multifarious in the fruit of mutants compared with the control; mutant 7 has better comprehensive nutritional quality of fruit, whereas mutant 12 and 14 stand second. The above results showed that effects of ion beam or soybean DNA on tomato genomic DNA would lead to the changes in gene expression, protein synthesis and fruit quality, moreover some tomato plants with better fruit quality or special characters were achieved, which would provide basis for the application of ion beam technology in tomato breeding.
References
Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72(1-2): 248-254.
Chang F, Liu X, Li Y, Jia G, Ma J, Liu G and Zhu Z. 2003. Changes in DNA base sequences in the mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana induced by low-energy N+ implantation. Science in China (Series C). 46(5): 503-512.
Chen LZ, Zhai RR and Li J. 2012. Determination of vitamin C in green team from Hainan Baisha. Guangzhou Chemical Industry. 40(6): 103-104.
Chen RL, Song DJ, Li YF, Wu LJ and Yu ZL. 2002. Study in mutation of Muskmelon genome DNA due to low energy N+ implantation using RAPD. Acta Laser Biology Sinica. 11(1): 75-78.
Duan HY, Yu YA, He YL, Zhou YQ and Lu LD. 2013. Mutagenic effects of low energy ions on root tip cells of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Plant Omics. 6(5): 355-358.
Duan HY, Yu YA, Li XW and Duan ZQ. 2012. Summary of plant transformation mediated by low energy ion beam. Biology Teaching. 37(1): 12-13.
Gao WJ, Su JX, Xie L, Deng CL, Zhang T and Lu LD. 2012. The point mutation induced by the low-energy N+ ion implantation in impatiens balsamine genome. Russian Journal of Genetics. 48(10): 1009-1014.
Huang WC, Fan SJ, Huang JN, Sang JL, Shi YF, Xia ZE, Wu WJ and Yao HL. 1994. Study on mutagenic effect of ion implantation into microorganism. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University. 21(3): 282- 285.
Ji SD, Li JX, Zhao JJ, Xu CS, Qin GY, Wang WD and Huo YP. 2001. Analysis of fingerprint of transgenic Wheat leaves irradiated with low energy. Journal of Triticeae Crops. 21(4): 52-55.
Kangfu Y and Peter PK. 1994. Optimization of DNA extraction and PCR procedures for Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis in Plants PCR Technology. Current Innovation CRC Press. 193.
Li J and Sun SM. 2011. Review of plasma ion immersion implantation and deposition. China Science and Technology Review. 30: 76.
Liu HY, Wang HH, Cui CH, Wang M, Guo JJ, Wen ZP and Li AQ. 2013. Experiment improvement of the soluble sugar content determination by enthrone colorimetric method. Laboratory Science. 16(2):19-20.
Pamidimarri DV, Mastan SG, Rahman H and Reddy MP. 2010. Molecular characterization and genetic diversity analysis of Jatropha curcas L. in India using RAPD and AFLP analysis. Molecular biology reports. 37(5): 2249-2257.
Phanchaisri B, Samsang N, Yu L, Singkarat S and Anuntalabhochai S. 2012. Expression of OsSPY and 14 -3-3 genes involved in plant height variations of ion-beam-induced KDML 105 rice mutants. Mutation research. 734(1-2): 56-61.
Wang T, Li W, Chen HW and Yu ZL. 2009. A research of the progress in low-energy ion beam bioengineering and its applications. Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology. 24(1): 6-10.
Wang XJ, Liang Y, Xu JX, Sun YD and Zuo JM. 2010. Multiple statistics analysis of the quality traits of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica. 19(9): 103-108.
Welsh J, Petersen C and Mcclelland M. 1991. Polymorphisms generated by arbitrarily primed PCR in the mouse application to strain identification and genetic mapping. Nucleic Acids Research. 19(2): 303-306.
Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA and Tingey SV. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research.18(22): 6531-6535.
Xue J, Xia SY, Zhang YW, Jin FM and Liu ZQ. 2004. Study on diversity of quality characteristics in tomato. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica. 19(4): 7-10.
Yu LX, Li WJ, Dong XC, Zhou LB and Ma S. 2008. RAPD analysis on dwarf mutant of Dahlia pinnata Cav induced by 80 meV/u12 C6+ ions. Nuclear Techniques. 31(11): 830-833.
Yu ZL. (2000). Ion beam application in genetic modification. IEEE Transaction on Plasma Science. 28 (1): 128-132.
Zhang ZH, Du LQ, Li YX, Li HJ, Guo BH and Zhu ZQ. 1998. The variations of M1 to the seeds of tobacco implanted with ion beam. Acta Biophysica Sinica. 14(4): 762-766.
Zhou GL. 2009. Research progress on the ion beam mutation technique. Modern Agricultural Sciences and Technology. 19: 342-343.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.