Keywords
Women participation
Self-help
Community development groups
Project zones
How to Cite
Abstract
The ever-growing and dwindling resources at the disposal of African Governments, particularly Nigeria in providing or addressing the basic needs of citizens gave rise to the heightened glamour for private sector involvement in public services delivery. This is the logic behind the recognition of community efforts in promoting self-help projects and the formation of Community Development Groups and Associations (CDGs/As) as vehicle for the initiation and execution of community-based development projects. This paper reports the findings of a study carried out on the contributions of these private community-based initiatives in Nasarawa State at the micro level with focus on the mechanism of member-participation within the CDGs with particular reference to the level of youth and women involvement in community development in the state. The inquiries for the research involved two aspects of data-primary and secondary. The former involved field work, while the latter concerned and relied on review of official records. One hundred percent (100%) of membership lists was systematically drawn from a collection of alphabetically arranged row of CDGs from three designated Community Development Project Zones where each centrally occurring group was picked. A total of 125 respondents (45, 20, and 60 respectively), including group officials were found expedient for the research. One interview schedule of questionnaires and one informants’ interview formed the data acquisition instruments, in addition to audio-visual and focus-group discussion. Data was analyzed and presented using simple descriptive statistical techniques. Results obtained showed dismal ratios of 19%, 29%; 10%, 0% and 28%, 22% respectively, in Youth and Women participation in the groups studied, with values varying distinctively between urban and rural communities. The findings indicate facts concerning the performance and outcome of member-participation in self-help project planning in Nasarawa State and by implication, their role in rendering their quota in collaboration with government in community development. The study recommends that policy attention at strengthening member-participation in community-based self-help projects should focus on the teeming youths and women population by improving their educational or literacy level to arouse their awareness on the need for participation.
References
Cornwall Andrea. (2001). Beneficiary, consumer, citizen: perspectives of participation for poverty reduction. paper for the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). 89 p.
Guijt I, Shah and Meera Kaul. (1998). The myth of community: gender issues in participatory development. Practical Action, 320 p.
Jua N. (2002). Small is not always beautiful: a case study of the Njinikom area development association. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 11(3): 336-358.
Njoh A. (2002). Barriers to community participation in development planning: lessons from the Mutengene (Cameroon) self-help water project. Community Development Journal, 37(3): 233-248.
Nkwi P. (1997). Rethinking the role of elites in rural development. a case study from Cameroon. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 15(1): 67-86.
Theron F. (2005). Public participation as a micro-level development strategy, In Davids, F. Theron and K. Maphunye. Participatory Development in South Africa. A Development Management Perspective. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers. 111-131 p.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.