Keywords
Point Calimere
Winter migrants
Flamingos
How to Cite
Abstract
Totally 46 waterbird species were identified at the Great Vedaranyam Swamp of the Point Calimere Wildlife Sanctuary during October 2007 - March 2010. It included waterbird species representing 11 families and 5 orders comprising of winter migrants (30 species), residents (9 species) and seasonal migrants (7 species). The birds were classified into five categories in terms of abundance, namely, common (33%), very rare (30%), very common (15%), rare (11%) and occasional (11%). The highest number of species was observed during November–February (46 species) and lowest during July (5 species). The highest bird number was recorded in January 2010 (3,582 individuals). The commonest species is Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber (1,254 individuals). The major threats and a few management suggestions have been made on the improvements to the conservation of Great Vedaranyam Swamp of the Point Calimere Wildlife Sanctuary
References
Alfred JRB, Nandi NC. 2000. Faunal diversity in Indian Wetlands. Environment News 4:10-32.
Ali S. 1969. The Book of Indian Birds (8th Edition). Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay.
Arun Kumar J, Sati P, Tak PC. 2003. Checklist of Indian waterbirds. Buceros 8(1):10-40.
Asian Water Bird Census. 2001. http//www.wetland.org//and http//www.ramsar.org//
Balachandran S, Hussain SA. 1994. Longest longevity record for the Lesser Sandplover Charadrius mongolus Pallas. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 91(1):140-141.
Balachandran S, Natarajan V. 1992. Unusual behaviour or an adaptation against predator in Terek Sandpiper Tringa terek. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 89(3):373.
Balachandran S. 1993. Conservation status of waders in India. Avian conservation proceedings of the workshop at Coimbatore 3rd - 5th.
Balachandran S. 1995. Comments on “The Occurrence of Black Tern Chlidonias niger at Point Calimere by Vivek Menon”. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 91(3):453-454.
Balachandran S. 1998. Bird migration studies in India. Final Report (1980–1992). Phase I: Population structure and movement of Indian avifauna (1980–1986), Phase II: Bird migration (1987–1992). Final Report. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai.
Balachandran S. 2006. The decline in wader populations along the east coast of India with special reference to Point Calimere, south-east India. In: Waterbirds around the World. Boere, G.C., C.A. Galbraith & D.A. Stroud (Eds.). The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK. pp. 296–301.
Grimmett R, Inskipp C, Inskipp T. 1999. Pocket Guide to the Birds of Indian Subcontinent. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Grimmett R, Inskipp C, Inskipp T. 2001. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. (Revised reprint 2001). Christopher Helm, London.
Hussain SA. 1991. Population structure and movement of Indian avifauna. Bird Migration. Annual Report I (1990–91). Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay.
Islam MZ, Rahmani AR. 2004. Important Bird Areas in India: Priority sites for conservation. Indian Bird Conservation Network: Bombay Natural History Society and Bird Life International (UK).
Kazmierczak KJ, Balachandran S, Rosalind L. 1992. Occurrence of Caspian Plover Charadrius asiaticus at Point Calimere, South India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 89(3):373.
King B, Woodcock M, Disckinson EC. 1978. A field guide to the birds of South-east Asia. Collins, St. Jame's Palace, London.
Manakadan R, Pittie A. 2002. Standardized English and scientific names of the birds of the Indian subcontinent. Newsletter for Birdwatchers 42(3):1-35.
Manakadan R. 1992. Ecology of waterbirds of Point Calimere Sanctuary with special reference to impact of salt works. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bombay, Bombay.
Manakadan R. 1995. Impact of salt works on the status, population of the Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber roseus and the Lesser Flamingo Phoenicopterus minor in the Great Vedaranyam Swamp. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 92(3):364-371.
Nagarajan R, Thiyagesan K. 1996. Waterbirds and substrate quality of the Pichavaram wetlands, southern India. Ibis 138:710-721.
Nagarajan R, Thiyagesan K. 2006. The effects of coastal shrimp farming on birds in Indian mangrove forests and tidal flats. Acta Zoologica Sinica 52 (Suppl.):541-548.
Perennou C, Santharam V. 1990. An ornithological survey of some wetlands in southeast India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 87(3):354-363.
Ramsar Site Report. 2002. Information sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS). Categories approved by recommendations 4.7 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. Extracted from http://www.wetlands.org/reports/ris/ 2IN01en.pdf.
Sampath K, Krishnamurthy K. 1989. Shorebirds of the salt ponds at Great Vedaranyam Salt Swamp. Stilt 15:20-23.
Sampath K, Krishnamurthy K. 1990. Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) of the Pichavaram mangroves, Tamil Nadu, India. Wader Study Group Bulletin 58:24-27.
Sampath K. 1989. Studies on the ecology of shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) of the Great Vedaranyam Swamp and the Pichavaram mangroves of India. Ph.D. Thesis, Annamalai University, Parangipettai, India.
Sampath K. 1991. Food habits of shorebirds from the Great Vedaranyam Salt Swamp of Tamil Nadu, India. Stilt 19:50-52.
Sonobe K, Usui S (Eds.). 1993. A field guide to the water birds of Asia. Wildlife Bird Society of Japan, Tokyo.
Sugathan R. 1985. Observations on Spoonbilled Sandpiper (Eurynorhynchus pygmaeus) in its wintering ground at Point Calimere, Thanjavur District, Tamil Nadu. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 82(2):407-408.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.