Keywords
density
mash
pellet
performance
stocking
How to Cite
Abstract
The effect of different physical form feeds (pellet and mash) and stocking density on the growth performance characteristics of carcass and immunity of Ross-308 broiler chicks were studied. A total of 1800 one day-old ross-308 mixed-sex broilers were used in a completely randomized design with six treatments and four replicates of 75 birds each. They were arranged in a 2×3 factorial design: two feed forms (mash and pellet) and three stocking density (10, 14 and 18 bird/m2). Live body Weight (LW), Weight Gain (WG), Feed Intake (FI) and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) were measured periodically (0-10, 11-24 and 25-42 days). Carcass components and litter quality were recorded at the end of the trial (day 45). Also antibody titer against SRBC, and heterophil to lymphocyte ratio were measured in 45 day of age. The highest body weight in grower period was observed in the pellet diet form (p<0.05). Also the highest Body Weight (BW) and Body Weight Gain (BWG) in the starter period was observed in the lowest stocking density treatment (10 bird/m2) (p<0.05). Physical form of diet had no significant effect on feed intake, BW and FCR throughout the periods. However the broiler feed intake was significantly influenced by stocking density and a decrease in the high stocking density group (18 bird/m2). Different types of feed and stocking density had no significant effect on carcass characteristics, antibody titer and H:L ratio. Use of pellet form diet and high stocking density treatment (18 bird/m2) significantly increased broiler litter moisture (P<0.05).
References
Buijs S, Keeling L, Rettenbacher S, Van Poucke E and Tuyttens FAM. (2009). Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poultry Science, 88(8): 1536-1543.
Chewning CG, Stark CR and Brake J. (2012). Effects of particle size and feed form on broiler performance. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 21(4): 830–837.
Dozier WA, Thaxton JP, Purswell JL, Olanrewaju HA, Branton SL and Roush WB. (2006). Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight. Poultry Science, 85(2): 344–351.
Dozier WA, Thaxton JP, Branton SL, Morgan GW, Miles DM, Roush WB, Lott BD and Vizzier-Thaxton Y. (2005). Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Science, 84(8): 1332-1338.
Eriflir M. (2002). Yerleflim sıklıı arttırılan bıldırcınların (Coturnix coturnix japonica) bazı biyokimyasal kan parametrelerindeki deoifliklikler. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Science, 26: 491-496.
Feddes JJ Emmanuel EJ and Zuidhof MJ. (2002). Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poultry Science, 81(6): 774–779.
Ghobadi Z and Karimi A. (2012). Effect of feed processing and enzyme supplementation of wheat-based diets on performance of broiler chicks. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 40(3): 260 266.
Gross WB and Siegel HS. (1983). Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Disease, 27(4): 972-979.
Haslam SM, Brown SN, Wilkins LJ Kestin SC, Warriss PD and Nicol CJ. (2006). Preliminary study to examine the utility of using foot burn or hock burn to assess aspects of housing conditions for broiler chicken. British Poultry Science, 47(1): 13–18.
Heckert RA, Estevez I, Russek-Cohen E and Pettit-Riley R.(2002). Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poultry Science, 81(4): 451–457.
Houshmand M, Azhar K, Zulkifli I, Bejo MH and Kamyab A. (2012). Effects of prebiotic, protein level and stocking density on performance, immunity and stress indicators of broilers. Poultry Science, 91(2): 393-401.
Jahan MS, Asaduzzaman M and Sarkar AK. (2006). Performance of broiler fed on mash, pellet and crumble. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5(3): 265–70.
Mingbin Lv, Lei Yan, Zhengguo W, Sha An, Miaomiao Wu and Zunzhou Lv. (2015). Effects of feed form and feed particle size on growth performance, carcass characteristics and digestive tract development of broilers. Animal Nutrition, 1(3): 252–256.
Ravindran V and Thomas DV. (2004). Performance and welfare of broilers as affected by stocking density and in-feed antibiotic supplementation. Proceedings of the 16th Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, New-South Wales, Australia, 9-11 ,135-138.
Salari S, Kermanshahi H and Nasiri MH. (2006). Effect of sodium bentonite and comparison of pellet vs mash on performance of broiler chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5(1): 31–4.
SAS Institute. (2005). User’s Guide. Version 9. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
Stevenson JR and Taylor R. (1988). Effects of glucocorticoid and antiglucocorticoid hormones on leukocyte numbers and function. International Journal of Immunopharmacology, 10(1): 1–6.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.