Keywords
rancher’s behavior
rancher’s intention
animal sciences
How to Cite
Abstract
The aim of this review is studying environmental conditions and animal welfare from the perspective of animal science. The welfare of animals is the quality of life that the animal thinks to it. Animals develop cognitive- emotional systems of welfare needs to confront variable environment. Animal scientists consider animal feelings and the ability to cope with the environment as animal welfare. The role of Rancher’s behavior in livestock welfare and productivity has received serious attention from researchers in recent years, because rancher’s behaviour and interactions have considerable effects on livestock’s behavior, welfare and productivity. Therefore understanding the behaviour of rancher’s and the factors that contribute to this behaviour are necessary. The results indicated that when the relationship between human and animal improves, welfare and productivity level in animal increases in a way that the quality of Rancher’s behavior has considerable impact on welfare and productivity level of animals under their care.
References
Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH and Newman EA. (1992). Fear of humans and its relationships with productivity in laying hens at commercial farms. British Poultry Science, 33(4): 699-710.
Boogaard BK, Oosting SJ and Bock BB. (2008). Defining sustainability as a socio-cultural concept: citizen panels visiting dairy farms in the Netherlands. Livestock Science, :117(1): 24-33.
Bracke MBM and Hopster H. (2006). Assessing the importance of natural behavior for animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(1): 77-89.
Broom DM. (1991). Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science, 69(10): 4167-4175.
Carenzi C and Verga M. (2009). Animal welfare: review of the scientific concept and definition. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 8(sup1): 21-30.
Coleman GJ, Hemsworth PH, Hay M, Cox M. (2000). Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 66(1):11-20.
Cook AJ, Kerr GN, Moore K. (2002). Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food. Journal of Economic Psychology. 23(5):557-72.
Dinpanah GH and Akhavan A. (2014). Factors Affecting Organic Agricultural Knowledge Among Greenhouse Farmers in Varamin County. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 7(1): 101-111.
Godin G, Conner M and Sheeran P. (2005). Bridging the intention–behavior gap: The role of moral norm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4): 497-512.
Hansson H and Lagerkvist CJ. (2014). Defining and measuring farmers' attitudes to farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 23(1): 47-56.
Kielland C, Skjerve E, Østerås O and Zanella AJ. (2010). Dairy farmer attitudes and empathy toward animals are associated with animal welfare indicators. Journal of Dairy Science. 93(7): 2998-3006.
Lensink J, Boissy A and Veissier I. (2000). The relationship between farmers' attitude and behaviour towards calves, and productivity of veal units. In Annales de Zootechnie, 49(4): 313-327. EDP Sciences.
Lund V. (2001). Röcklinsberg H. Outlining a conception of animal welfare for organic farming systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14(4): 391-424.
Lund V, Anthony R and Röcklinsberg H. (2004). The ethical contract as a tool in organic animal husbandry. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 17(1): 23-49.
Place SE and Mitloehner FM. (2014). The nexus of environmental quality and livestock welfare. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 2(1): 555-69.
Ramirez E, Kulinna PH and Cothran D. (2012). Constructs of physical activity behaviour in children: the usefulness of social cognitive theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(3): 303-10.
Yazdanpanah M, Hayati D, Thompson M, Zamani GH and Monfared N. (2014). Policy and plural responsiveness: Taking constructive account of the ways in which Iranian farmers think about and behave in relation to water. Journal of Hydrology, 514: 347-57.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.