Keywords
Consciousness degree
Pregnancy
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to investigate the students' attitude and consciousness degree regarding the pregnancy health in 2013 in Eastern-Azerbaijan Province. So, 300 students in different semesters have been taken up as accidentally from Tabriz, Marand, Bonab, Maragheh and Ahar have been taken up in this study. The WHO illustrative questionnaire for interview-questionnaire designed by John Cleland surveys with young people has been applied in this study. The statistical data has been completed by the help of SPSS software and descriptive and t-test statistical cases. The results showed the attitude score from the family adjustment is significantly higher than the determined degree positively. The results showed the sexual diseases are significantly higher than the fixed determined degree positively. Also it showed there is no observed any significant difference between the degree of the conscious and the students' attitude based on their marital status The results did not show any significant difference regarding the degree of the attitude among students.
References
Chandra-Mouli V, Greifinger R, Nwosu A, Hainsworth G, Sundaram L, Hadi S, Fran McConville, Regina Benevides, Callie Simon, Archana Patkar, Eva Schoening, Disha Sethi, Amy Boldosser-Boesch, Prateek Awasthi, Arvind Mathur and Doortje Braeken (2013). Invest in adolescent and young people: it pays. Journal of Reproductive Health, 10(51): 1-5
Chin Bin, Lu Young- Ning, Wang Hong-Xiang, Ma Qing-Liang, Zhao Xiao-Ming, Guo Jian-Hua, Hu Kai, Wang Yi-Xin, Huang Yi-Ran and Chen Pei. (2008). Sexual and reproductive health service needs of university/college students: updates from a survey in Shanghai, China. Asian Journal Andrology, 10(4): 607-615
Eksi Z and Komurcu N. (2014). Knowledge level of university students about sexually transmitted disease. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 122: 465-472
Farih M, Khan K, Freeth D and Meads C. (2014). Protocol study: Sexual and reproductive health knowledge, information-seeking behaviour and attitudes among Saudi women: a questionnaire survey of university students. Journal of Reproductive Health, 11(1): 34.
Fransen-dos Santos R. (2009). Young people, sexual and reproductive health and HIV. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87: 877-879.
Glasier A, Gülmezoglu AM, Schmid GP, Moreno CG and Van Look PF. (2006). Sexual and reproductive health: a matter of life and death. Lancet, 368(9547): 1595-1607.
ICPD. (1994). Proposed domains and indicators linked to the definition of RH adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in 1994. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/reproductive_health/en/.
John Cleland. (2005). Illustrative Questionnaire for interview-Surveys with young people-part 2. Sexual and reproductive health, 55 p.
Keramat A, Vakilian K and Seyed AM. (2013). Barriers to youths’ use of reproductive health services in Iran. Life Sciences Journal, 10(2): 943-949.
Farahani FK, Shah I, Cleland J and Mohammadi MR. (2012). Adolescents males and young females in Tehran: Differing perspectives behaviors and needs for Reproductive health and implications for gender sensitive interventions. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility, 13(2): 101-110
Mazloomy MSS, Rahaei Z, Mirzaei AM, Soltani T, Bakhshi Z and Shadkam V. (2012). The survey of knowledge and attitude of university on reproductive health in the city of Yazd in 2010. The Journal of Toloo-e-behdasht, 10(3 and 3-4): 139-149.
Mousavi A, Keramat A, Vakilian K and Esmaeili VA. (2013). Development and Adaptation of Iranian Youth Reproductive Health Questionnaire. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hindwai Publishing Corporation. 7 p.
Iranian Statistics Center. (2011). National Census (in Persian). Accessed April 5, 2017. Available from: http://amar.org.ir/portals/0/files/abstract/1390/sarshomari90_nahaii.pdf
Reis M, Ramiro L, Gaspar MM and Alves DJ. (2013). Nationwide survey of contraceptive and sexuality transmitted infection knowledge, attitudes and skills of university students in Portugal. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13(2): 127-137
Rghahmani A, Mergihatiad Kh.E, Moghadam BL, Hajizahdeh A, Hamideh M and Montazeri A. (2014). Development and psychometric evaluation of the premarital sexual behavior assessment scale for young women (PSAS-YW): an exploratory mixed method study. Reproductive Health, 11(43):1-7.
Shafiee F, Abbasi Shuvazi M and Ebadi Fard Azar F. (2002). Evaluation of training courses population and family planning on knowledge and attitude and behavior of adolescent boys in reproductive health. Fertility and Infertility Journal, 237-250 (In Persian).
Shaw D. (2009). Access to sexual and reproductive health for young people: Bridging the disconnect between rights and reality. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 106(2): 132-136
Simbar M, Ramezani TF and Hashemi Z. (2003). The needs for reproductive health of the university students of Gazvin. The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, 7(4): 5-13.
Sommart J and Sota C. (2013). The effectiveness of a school-based sexual health education program for junior high school students in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral, 91: 208-214.
SPSS Inc. (2009). PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
[WHO] World Health Organization. (2007). Towards universal access: scaling up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector [Progress report]. Geneva: World Health Organization/Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; April 2007. 89 p.
United Nations [UN]. (1995). Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo. 5-13 September 1994; United Nations publication: Sales No. E.95.XIII.18), chap. I, resolution 1, annex. 192 p.
Vakilian K, Mousavi SA and Keramat A. (2014). Estimation of sexual behavior in the 18-to-24-years- old Iranian youth based on a crosswise model study. BMC Research Notes, 7: 28.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.