Keywords
Nutritive value
Energy sources
Hematological parameters
How to Cite
Abstract
This study was aimed at evaluating the nutritive value of different sources of energy in broiler diets on the growth performance and haematological parameters of broiler chickens. Five isonitrogenous and isocaloric diets for the broiler starter (0-4 weeks) and finisher phase (5-8 weeks) respectively were formulated. Treatment 1 is a control diet while treatments 2, 3, 4 and 5 were sorghum, pearl millet, cassava and sweet potatoes based diets respectively. A total of 225 day- old NAPRI X broiler chicks were randomly allotted to the five treatments in three replicates in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD). Data collected were analysed using the general linear model procedures of S.A.S. 9.0. Significant differences (P<0.05) in means among the dietary treatments were separated using a Tukey test. The results showed that final body weights (503.44 g and 2302.77 g), feed intake (819.67 g and 3073.70 g) and weight gained (453.61 g and 1892.07 g) were significantly (P<0.05) higher in birds fed millet diets (T3) respectively than other treatments for both starter and finisher phase, respectively. T3 (millet based diet) recorded significantly (P<0.05) the best feed conversion ratio (1.62) and the lowest feed cost per kg weight gain (^ 145.90) for finisher phase. Those fed the control (maize based diet (T1) and sorghum (T2) based diet gave similar (P>0.05) values as those fed T3 (millet based diets). Birds fed diet T5 (sweet potatoes) gave significantly (P<0.05) lowest values in all parameters measured and poor feed conversion ratio at the starter phase. Similar pattern was also observed in the finisher phase except in feed intake and mortality which were comparable with other dietary treatments. Dietary treatments had significant (P<0.05) in white and red blood cells. Millet based diet was determined to be the best with reduced cost of production without compromising productivity in broiler chickens. It is also recommended that other methods of processing millet should be exploited.
References
Agbabiaka L A. 2012. Growth response of broiler finishers fed graded levels of cooked and fermented castor oil bean (Ricinus communis l) meal. Science Research Reporter, 2(3): 183-186.
Belewu MA and Ojo-Alokomaro KO. 2007. Haematological indices of West African dwarf goat fed leaf meal based diets. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 13: 601-606.
Iheukwumere FC and Herbert U. 2003. Physiological responses of broiler chickens to quantitative water restrictions: haematology and serum biochemistry. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2(2): 117-119.
Jirgi DJ, Abeke FO, Onimisi PA and Akinsola OM. (2016). Nutritive evaluation of different energy sources with Maxigrain® enzyme in broiler diets under the tropical climate of Nigeria. Journal of Research in Biology, 7(6): 2124-2130.
Lamb GN. 1991. Manual of veterinary laboratory technique. Ciba-Geigy Ltd, Kenya, 98-99 p.
Mukhtar AM, Mohamed AS and Mohamed KA. (2015). The effect of dietary microbial phytase enzyme supplementation on the performance of broiler chicks. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 4(1): 30-34.
Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 1994. National Research council. Nutrient requirements of poultry 9th ed. National Academy press, Washington, DC. 176 p.
Rama Rao SV, Sunder GS, Reddy MR, Praharaj NK, Raju MV, Panda AK. 2001. Effect of supplementary choline on the performance of broiler breeders fed on different energy sources. Journal of British Poultry Science, 42(3): 362-367.
Rooney LW. 1990. Sorghum and pearl millet lipids. Journal of Cereal Chemistry, 55: 584-590.
Statistical Analysis System. 2002. Users guide statistics, Version 6th ed. SAS institute Inc. Cary. North Carolina, USA.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.