Keywords
Stimulators
Organizational health
How to Cite
Abstract
Abstract:
One of the most important challenges of plans for organizational improvement and change is personnel’ resistance toward applying changes because of mistrust to change. Therefore, organizations must identify factors stimulating mistrust to control and remove these factors. This survey was conducted in the personnel of Sina, Shariati, and Imam Khomeini hospitals with a sample of 260 people. The most important factors for mistrust stimulation of organizations have been identified based on theoretical studies and empirical evidence; these factors are organizational justice, cooperation in decision making, psychological contract violation, and negative personality. To collect data, six questionnaires were used. These questionnaires are organizational justice, cooperation in decision making, psychological contract violation, organizational health, mistrust to organizational change, and mistrust personality which consist of 69 questions. SPSS and structural equation modeling techniques were used to analyze data. The results showed that militant personality has the most effect on increasing organizational mistrust and reduce organizational mistrust. On the other hand the interactional justice has the most effect on reducing organizational mistrust and increasing administrative health.
References
Ajzen I and Fishbein M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice-Hall, 278 p.
Andersson LM. 1996. Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49(11): 1395-1418.
Bernerth JB, Armenakis AA, Field H, and Walker HJ. 2007. Justice, cynicism, and commitment a study of important organizational change variables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(3): 303-326.
Black JS and Gregersen HB. 1997. Participative decision-making: An integration of multiple dimensions. Human Relations, 50(7): 859-878.
Brandes P, Castro SL, Matrecia James SL, Martinez AD, Matherly TA, Ferris GR and Hochwarter WA. 2007. The interactive effects of job insecurity and organizational cynicism on work effort following a layoff. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 14(3): 233-247.
Brown M and Cregan C. 2008. Organizational change cynicism: The role of employee involvement. Human Resource Management, 47(4): 667-686.
Cohen-Charash and Spector PE. 2001. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(2): 278-321.
Dean JW, Brandes P and Dharwadkar R. 1998. Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management review, 23(2): 341-352.
Eaton JA. 2000. A social motivation approach to organizational cynicism. Doctoral dissertation, York University Toronto, Canada. 1-133 p.
Festinger L. 1962. A theory of cognitive dissonance (Evanston, IL: Row Peterson, 1957). Introduction and passim. 291 p.
Fleming P. 2005. Metaphors of resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(1): 45-66.
Greenberg J. 1993. Justice and organizational citizenship: A commentary on the state of the science. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3): 249-256.
Iranzadeh S and Khalili M. 2008. Productivity and quality management. 1st ed., Tabriz: Islamic Azad University of Tabriz Press.
Johnson JL and O'Leary-Kelly AM. 2003. The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5): 627-647.
Judge TA, Klinger R, Simon LS and Yang IWF. 2008. The contributions of personality to organizational behavior and psychology: Findings, criticisms, and future research directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5): 1982-2000.
Mishra AK and Spreitzer GM. 1998. Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign. Academy of management Review, 23(3): 567-588.
Naus F, Iterson A and Roe RA. 2007. Value incongruence, job autonomy, and organization-based self-esteem: A self-based perspective on organizational cynicism. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(2): 195-219.
Reichers AE, Wanous JP and Austin JT. 1997. Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(1): 48-59.
Ribbers IL. 2009. Trust, cynicism, and organizational change: the role of management. Unpublished Master thesis. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Tilburg University. Consultado Enero, 22 p.
Rubin RS, Dierdorff E, Bommer WH and Baldwin T. 2009. Do leaders reap what they sow? Leader and employee outcomes of leader organizational cynicism about change. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5): 680-688.
Shariatmadari M. 2009. Survey in behavioral sciences, Tehran: Koohsar
Stanley DJ, Meyer JP and Topolnytsky L. 2005. Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(4): 429-459.
Treadway DC, Hochwarter WA, Ferris GR, Kacmar CJ, Douglas C, Ammeter AP and Buckley MR. 2004. Leader political skill and employee reactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4): 493-513.
Wanous JP, Reichers AE and Austin JT. 1994. Organizational Cynicism: An Initial Study. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1: 269-273.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.