Keywords
Krishnagiri reservoir
Organic pollution
Benthic community
How to Cite
Abstract
The diversity of benthic invertebrates from in and around Krishnagiri reservoir was studied during the period of Jan 2006-June 2008. The benthic index calculated using Oligochaeta communities with environmental characteristics considering the variation over a period of time was done from Jan 2006 - June 2008. Oligochaeta species abundance was consistently higher in the eutrophicated reservoir, evidently proved by literatures. In the statistical analysis benthic communities are grouped by season rather than by month, the result revealed that the structure of the Oligochaeta community was mainly influenced by environmental parameters. The results presented in this paper is helpful to evaluate the current status of the reservoir using the diversity of benthic community.
References
Chakrabarty D and Das SK. 2006. Alteration of macroinvertebrate community in tropical aquatic systems in relation to sediment redox potential and overlaying water quality. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2(4): 327-334.
Collado R and Schmelz RM. 2001. Oligochaete distribution patterns in two german hardwater lakes of different trophic state. Limnologica, 31(4): 317-328
Edmondson WT. 1959. A freshwater Biology, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, USA. 1248 p.
Lang C. 1985. Eutrophication of lake Geneva indicated by the oligochaete communities of the profundal. Hydrobiologia, 126(3): 237-243.
Lang C and Reymond O. 1996. Empirical relationships between oligochaetes, phosphorus and organic deposition during the recovery of Lake Geneva from eutrophication. Archiv füer Hydrobiologie, 136(2): 237-245.
Ludwig JA and Reynolds JF. 1988. Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 85-106 p.
Milbrink G. 1983. An improved environmental index based on the relative abundance of oligochaete species. Hydrobiologia, 102(2): 87-89
.
Milbrink G. 1994. Oligochaetes and water pollution in two deep Norwegian lakes. Aquatic Oligochaete Biology V, 278: 213-222.
Peet RK. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5: 485-499.
Quinn JF and Dunham AE. 1983. On the hypothesis testing in ecology and evolution. The American Naturalist, 122(5): 602-617.
Reice SR and Wohlenberg M. 1993. Monitoring freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates and benthic processes: measures for assessment of ecosystem health. 287–305 p in Chapman and Hall New York, NY.
SPSS. 2017. IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Thorne R and Williams P. 1997. The response of benthic macroinvertebrates to pollution in developing countries: a multimetric system of bioassessment. Freshwater Biology, 37(3): 671-686.
Vanamala Naidu K and Abhinender Naidu K. 1981. Some aquatic oligochaetes of the Nilgiris, South India. Hydrobiologia, 76(1-2): 113-118
Wiederholm T. 1980. Use of benthos in lake monitoring. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 52(3): 537-547.
Yap KA. Rahim IA, Ismail A and Tan SG. 2003. Species diversity of macrobenthic invertebrates in the Semenyih river, Selangor, peninsular Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, 26(2): 139 -146.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.