Abstract
The current research was done to study the reproductive performances of Algerian she-camel for meat production. The study was conducted from March 2006 to May 2016 in Souf region; southeast of Algeria where a total of 71 camel herders were randomly selected for data collection using a questionnaire tool. The study revealed that all camel herders bred camels only for meat production by keeping high breeding rates of females in herds. The survey showed that she-camel Sexual activity Took place in the rainy season extending from October to the beginning of May and intensified between December to January. The mean age at first mating, first calving and gestation length were 45.8 ±0.77, 58±0.76 and 12.1±0.03 months respectively. Calving interval and lactation length were 22.1±0.51 and 13.6±0.56 months respectively. The mean age at culling was 22.7±0.47 years. The average number of births during a reproductive lifespan was 7.33±0.21 calves. The mean birth weight was 20.9±0.49kg. Due to their low reproductive performances, camels are not good suppliers of meat. Reducing age at first parturition and calving interval seems to be a good solution that has to be recommended for better meat productivity.
References
Abdelgadir M, Faye B and Nikhala AA. 2013. Lactation curves of dairy camels in an intensive system. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45(4): 1039-1046.
Abdussamad AM, Holtz W, Gauly M, Suleiman MS and Bello MB. 2011. Reproduction and breeding in dromedary camels: insights from pastoralists in some selected villages of the Nigeria-Niger corridor. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23(8): 2011.
Almutairi SE, Boujenane I, Musaad A and Awad-Acharari F. 2010. Non-genetic factors influencing reproductive traits and calving weight in Saudi camels. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42(6): 1087-1092.
Benyoucef MT and Bouzegag B. 2006. Résultats d'étude de la qualité de la viande de deux races cameline (targui et sahraoui) a Ouargla et Tamanrasset (Algérie). Annales de l'Institut national agronomique-El Harrach, 27(1): 37-53.
Faye B 2015. Special issue on" some preliminary results of the procamed project (promotion of innovations in the camel sector for a sustainable development in the mediterranean basin)". Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 27(4): 1-4.
Gebissa DT. 2015. Husbandry practices and utilization of camel products in Borana zone of Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Science Research, 3(4): 191-197.
Hammadi M, Khorchani T, Khaldi G, Majdoub A, Abdouli H, Slimane N, Portetelle D and Renaville R. 2001. Effect of diet supplementation on growth and reproduction in camels under arid range conditions. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement, 5(2): 69-72.
Hertrampf JW. 2004. The "ship of the desert" as a meat supplier. Fleischwirtschaft, 84: 111-114.
Jaji AZ, Elelu N, Mahre MB, Jaji K, Mohammed LG, Likita MA, Kigir ES, Onwuama KT and Saidu AS. 2017. Herd growth parameters and constraints of camel rearing in northeastern Nigeria. Pastoralism, 7(1): 16-25.
Keskes S, Ibrahim M, Tessema TS, Tamir B, Regassa F, Kassa T and Dawo F. 2013. Production systems and reproductive performances of camelus dromedarius in Somali regional state, Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development, 107(2): 243-266.
Lahlou-Kassi A, Anouassi A and Sghiri M. 1989. Nutrition et reproduction chez le dromadaire. Cahiers Option méditerranéennes. Série Seminaires, A(2): 141-149.
Mayouf R, Benaissa M, Bentria Y, Aoune FZ and Halis Y. 2014. Reproductive performance of camelus dromedarius in the El-Oued region, Algeria. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research, 4(4): 102-106.
Mehari Y, Mekuriaw Z and Gebru G. 2007. Potentials of camel production in Babilie and Kebribeyah woredas of the Jijiga zone, Somali region, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19(4).
Moslah M, Hammadi M and Khorchani T. 2004. Productivité de l’élevage camelin dans les parcours du sud tunisien. Ferchichi A. (comp.). Réhabilitation des pâturages et des parcours en milieux méditerranéens= Rangeland and pasture rehabilitation in Mediterranean areas. Zaragoza (Spain). Ciheam-Iamz, 62: 343-347.
Moslah M. 1993. L’amélioration de la productivité du dromadaire en Tunisie par la séparation précoce du chamelon et l’allaitement artificiel. I n saint martin (eds), peut-on améliorer les performances de reproduction des camelins? Paris 10–12 septembre 1990. Etud. Synth. IEMVT. 4(1): 225-237.
Najah A. 1971. Le souf des oasis. Alger: La Maison des Livres. 174 p.
Senoussi A 2011. Le camelin : facteur de la biodiversité et à usages multiples. Actes du Séminaire International sur la Biodiversité Faunistique en Zones Arides et Semi-arides. 265- 273 p.
SPSS. 2017. IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Tefera M and Gebreah F. 2001. A study on the productivity and diseases of camels in eastern Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 33(4): 265-274.
Titaouine M. 2006. Considération zootechniques de l’élevage du dromadaire dans le sud-est algérien influence du sexe et de la saison sur certains paramètres sanguins thèse magister en science vétérinaires. In: UEL Hadj Lakhdar Batna P. 110 p.
Tolera A and Abebe A 2007. Livestock production in pastoral and agro-pastoral production systems of southern Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19(12): 4-7.
Voisin AR. 2004. Le Souf, monographie. El Walid, El Oued-Algérie. 319 p.
Wilson RT. 1984. The camel. Longman London. 223 p.
Wilson RT. 1978. Studies on the livestock of southern Darfur, Sudan. V. notes on camel. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 10(1): 19-25.
Yagil R. 1982. Camels and camel milk. FAO Animal Production and Health. Rome, Italy. 62 p.
Zarrouk A, Souilem O and Beckers J. 2003. Actualités sur la reproduction chez la femelle dromadaire (camelus dromedarius). Revue d’elevage et de medicine veterinaire des pays tropicaux, 56(1-2): 95-102.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.