Keywords
Microbial diversity
Bioremediation
Physico-Chemical analysis
How to Cite
Abstract
The role of cyanobacteria in distilleries effluent was studied in Kanchipuram Tamilnadu, India. Totally 12 species of cyanobacteria belonging to 6 genera falling under 4 families were identified. Six different genera of bacteria and 3 different genera of fungi were isolated and identified. Among the cyanobacteria isolated, Nostoc muscorum was selected to treat the effluent. Distilleries effluent was the potential source of cyanobacteria. Nostoc muscorum was found to be the most dominated genus in this effluent (heterocyst organism). The inoculation of Nostoc muscorum resulted in removal of various chemicals as well as nutrients such as nitrogen, ammonia and phosphorus from the effluent. It is concluded that Nostoc muscorum, a cyanobacteria found in the distilleries effluent, could be potentially employed for the treatment of distilleries effluent
References
Al-Hasan RH, Ali AM and Radwan SS. 1989. Effect of light and dark incubation on the lipid and fatty acid composition of marine cyanobacterium. J. Gen. Microbiol., 135:865-872.
APHA, AWWA and WPCF. 1975. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 14th ed. New York.
Bakare AA, Lateef A, Amuda OS and Afolabi RO. 2003. The aquatic toxicity in characterization of chemical and microbiological constituents of water samples from Oba river, Odo-Oba, Nigeria. Asian J. Microbia. Biotech. Env. Sci., 5(1):11-17.
Bergey DH and Buchanan RE. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. American society for microbiology 1974. Pub.Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins Co. 8thedition.
Boominathan M, Sundararaman M and Manoharan C. 2007. Biodiversity of microbes in dairy effluent. Poll. Res., 26(2):271-276.
Colman B. 1989. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and the suppression of photorespiration in the cyanobacteria. Aquat. Bot., 34:211-231.
Dash AK and Mishra PC. 1999. Role of the bluegreen alga Westiellopsis prolifica in reducing pollution load from paper mill wastewater. Indian J. Environ. Protect., 19:1-5.
Desikachary TV. 1959. Cyanophyta, I.C.A.R. New Delhi.
Difco Manual, 1953. Difxo Laboratories Inc., D’etrioit, Mich 9th edition.
Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK and Simitle F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determinating sugar and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28(3):350-356.
Ellis MB. 1971. Dematiaceous Hypomycetes, Commonwealth Mycological Institute Pub. Kew Surrey, England.
Ellis MB. 1976. More Dematiaceous Hypomycetes, Commonwealth Mycological Institute Pub. Kew Surrey, England.
Fay P. 1983. The Blue-Greens, Arnold Publishers Ltd., London. Vol.14.
Geitler L. 1932. Cyanophyceae, In Rabenhort’s Kryptogamen flora, Akademische VerlagsgellSchaft Lepzig. 1196.
Gillman JC. 1957. A Manual of Soil Fungi, Revised 2 nd edn, Oxford and I.B.H. Publishing Company (Indian reprint), Calcutta, Bombay, New Delhi. 250.
Gopalakrishnan T. 2007. Role of cyanobacteria in sugar mill effluent, M.Phil. Dissertation, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirapalli, India.
Gupta SK and Rao AVS. 1980; Treatment of urea by algae, activated sludge and flocculating algal bacterial system. A comparative Study. Indian J. Envion. Hlth., 22:103-112.
Jain N, Nanjundaswamy C, Minocha AK and Verma CL. 2001. Isolation, screening and identification of bacterial strains for degradation of predigested distillery waste water. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 39:490-492.
Jaganathan K. 2006. Bioremediation studies on oil refinery industry effluent using Oscillatoria earli Gartner. M.Phil. Dissertation, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirapalli, India.
Jayaraman J. 1981. Colorimetric estimation of amino acids, In Laboratory Manual in Biochemistry, Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi. 64.
Kankal NC, Nema P, Gokhe BH and Mehata CG. 1987. Dissolved oxygen and detention time as process parameters in sewage treatment by aerated lagoon, IACPW Tech. Annual 14:61-66.
Lang HE, Ha D, Xie Q and Che X. 1999. An approach to studying heavy metal pollution caused by modern city development in Nanjing, China. Environ. Geology 38:223-228.
Lester WF. 1975. Polluted river: River ternt England. In River Ecology [Whitton, B.A. (ed.)], Oxford. 725.
Loehle C. 1995. Anamalous response of plants to CO2 enrichment. Oikos. 73:181-187.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL and Randali RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin-phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193:265-275.
Manoharan C and Subramanian G. 1992. Sewage-cyanobacterial interaction – A case study, IJEP. 12(4): 254-258.
Manoharan C and Subramanian. 1993. Feasibility studies on using cyanobacteria in Ossein effluent treatment. Indian J. Environ. Hlth. 35(2):88-96.
Manoharan C and Subramanian G. 1996. Effect of Ossein effluent on the biochemistry of Oscillatoria pseudogemina var. unigranulata Biswas, J. Environ. Biol. 17(2):157-161.
Mallick N and Rai LC. 1994. Removal of inorganic ions from wastewaters by immobilized microalgae. World J. Microbiol. Biotech., 10(4):439-443.
Oswald WJ, Lee EW, Adan B and Yao KH. 1978. New wastewater treatment method yields a harvest of saleable algae, W.H.O. Chronicle 32:348-350.
Prakasham RS and Ramakrishna SV. 1998. The role of cyanobacteria in effluent treatment. J. Sci. Indust. Res., 258-265.
Reddy TRK, Rao JCS and Radhakrishnan TM. 1983. Toxicity of oil refinery effluent on physiological responses of algae. Phykos., 22:86-93.
Richmond A and Becker EW. 1986. Technological aspects of mass cultivation - A general outline. In CRC Hand Book of Microalgal Mass Culture [Richmond (ed.)]. 245-263.
Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M and Stanier RY. 1979. Generic assignments, strain histories and properties, pure cultures of cyanobacteria, J. Gen. Microbiol., 111:1-61.
Sato N and Murata N. 1988. Membrane lipids. In Methods in Enzymology [Packer, L. and Glazer, A.N. (eds.)], Academic Press, New York. 167:251-259.
Satyawali Y and Balakrishnan M. 2008; Waste water treatment in molasses-based alcohol distilleries for COD and colour removal : A Review, J. Environ. Manage., 86(3):481-497.
Sharma K, Lakshmi N, Venugopalan K, Mehta P, Maheshwari A and Bapura S. 2003. X-ray diffraction between cyanobacteria and dairy effluent, Curr. Sci., 85(9):1330-1334.
Subramanian G and Shanmugasundaram S. 1986. Flow of carbon through the Nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Anabaena, Phytosynthetica 20:442- 446.
Subramanian CV. 1971. Hypomycetes, I.C.A.R., Publications, New Delhi.
Tang EPY, Vincent WF, Proulx D, Lessard P and Noue J. 1997. Polar cyanobacteria versus green algae for tertiary waste-water treatment in cool climates, J. Appl. Phycol., 9:371-381.
Turpin DH. 1991. Effects of inorganic Navailability on algal photosynthesis and carbon metabolism, J. Phycol., 27:14-20.
Uma L and Subramanian G. 1990. Effective use of cyanobacteria in effluent treatment, Natl. Symp. Cyanobacterial Nitrogen-Fixation, IARI, New Delhi. 437-444.
Vijayakumar S. Thajuddin N and Manoharan C. 2005. Role of cyanobacteria in the treatment of dye industry effluent. Poll. Res., 24(1):79-84.
Vijayakumar S Thajuddin N and Manoharan C. 2007. Biodiversity of cyanobacteria in industrial effluent. Acta Botanica Malacitana 32:27-34.
Venkateswarlu V. 1969. An ecological study of the algae of the Moosi river, Hyderabad (India) with special reference to Water Pollution Part I Physico-chemical Complexes, Hydrobiol., 33(1):117-143.
Copyright license for the research articles published in Journal of Research in Biology are as per the license given below
Creative Commons License
Journal of Research in Ecology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (www.creativecommons.org)
Based on a work at www.jresearchbiology.com
What this License explains us?
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
[As given in the www.creativecommons.org website]
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.