Comparative evaluation of different energy sources in broiler diets

  • Jirgi DJ Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, P.M.B 135 FCT Garki, Abuja. Nigeria
  • Abeke FO National Animal Production Research Institute, Shika Zaria, Kaduna State. Nigeria
Keywords: Feedstuff, Nutritive value, Energy sources, Hematological parameters

Abstract

This study was aimed at evaluating the nutritive value of different sources of energy in broiler diets on the growth performance and haematological parameters of broiler chickens. Five isonitrogenous and isocaloric diets for the broiler starter (0-4 weeks) and finisher phase (5-8 weeks) respectively were formulated. Treatment 1 is a control diet while treatments 2, 3, 4 and 5 were sorghum, pearl millet, cassava and sweet potatoes based diets respectively. A total of 225 day- old NAPRI X broiler chicks were randomly allotted to the five treatments in three replicates in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD). Data collected were analysed using the general linear model procedures of S.A.S. 9.0. Significant differences (P<0.05) in means among the dietary treatments were separated using a Tukey test. The results showed that final body weights (503.44 g and 2302.77 g), feed intake (819.67 g and 3073.70 g) and weight gained (453.61 g and 1892.07 g) were significantly (P<0.05) higher in birds fed millet diets (T3) respectively than other treatments for both starter and finisher phase, respectively. T3 (millet based diet) recorded significantly (P<0.05) the best feed conversion ratio (1.62) and the lowest feed cost per kg weight gain (^ 145.90) for finisher phase. Those fed the control (maize based diet (T1) and sorghum (T2) based diet gave similar (P>0.05) values as those fed T3 (millet based diets). Birds fed diet T5 (sweet potatoes) gave significantly (P<0.05) lowest values in all parameters measured and poor feed conversion ratio at the starter phase. Similar pattern was also observed in the finisher phase except in feed intake and mortality which were comparable with other dietary treatments. Dietary treatments had significant (P<0.05) in white and red blood cells. Millet based diet was determined to be the best with reduced cost of production without compromising productivity in broiler chickens. It is also recommended that other methods of processing millet should be exploited.

References

Adeola O. 2006. Amino acid digestibility in corn, pearl millet, and sorghum for white Pekin ducks (Anas platyrinchos domesticus). Japanese Poultry Science, 43: 357–364.

Agbabiaka L A. 2012. Growth response of broiler finishers fed graded levels of cooked and fermented castor oil bean (Ricinus communis l) meal. Science Research Reporter, 2(3): 183-186.

Belewu MA and Ojo-Alokomaro KO. 2007. Haematological indices of West African dwarf goat fed leaf meal based diets. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 13: 601-606.

Iheukwumere FC and Herbert U. 2003. Physiological responses of broiler chickens to quantitative water restrictions: haematology and serum biochemistry. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2(2): 117-119.

Jirgi DJ, Abeke FO, Onimisi PA and Akinsola OM. (2016). Nutritive evaluation of different energy sources with Maxigrain® enzyme in broiler diets under the tropical climate of Nigeria. Journal of Research in Biology, 7(6): 2124-2130.

Lamb GN. 1991. Manual of veterinary laboratory technique. Ciba-Geigy Ltd, Kenya, 98-99 p.

Mukhtar AM, Mohamed AS and Mohamed KA. (2015). The effect of dietary microbial phytase enzyme supplementation on the performance of broiler chicks. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 4(1): 30-34.

Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 1994. National Research council. Nutrient requirements of poultry 9th ed. National Academy press, Washington, DC. 176 p.

Rama Rao SV, Sunder GS, Reddy MR, Praharaj NK, Raju MV, Panda AK. 2001. Effect of supplementary choline on the performance of broiler breeders fed on different energy sources. Journal of British Poultry Science, 42(3): 362-367.

Rooney LW. 1990. Sorghum and pearl millet lipids. Journal of Cereal Chemistry, 55: 584-590.

Statistical Analysis System. 2002. Users guide statistics, Version 6th ed. SAS institute Inc. Cary. North Carolina, USA.
Published
2018-01-28
How to Cite
DJ, J., & FO, A. (2018). Comparative evaluation of different energy sources in broiler diets. Journal of Research in Biology, 8(1), 2408-2412. Retrieved from https://ojs.jresearchbiology.com/ojs1/index.php/jrb/article/view/461