Biochemical responses and proline metabolism in Amaranthus tricolor L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. under in vitro NaCl Stress

  • Murugan K Plant Biochemistry and Molecular biology Lab, Department of Botany, University College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala-695 034, India
  • Sunukumar SS Plant Biochemistry and Molecular biology Lab, Department of Botany, University College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala-695 034, India
  • Harish SR Plant Biochemistry and Molecular biology Lab, Department of Botany, University College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala-695 034, India
  • Manoj GS Plant Biochemistry and Molecular biology Lab, Department of Botany, University College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala-695 034, India
  • Remya Krishnan Plant Biochemistry and Molecular biology Lab, Department of Botany, University College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala-695 034, India
Keywords: Amaranthus tricolor, ions, proline, salt stress, soluble proteins

Abstract

Salinity is currently the major factor which reduces crop yields. One of the biological approaches is to use salt tolerant plants. Amaranthus tricolor L. has been used as a promising plant to ameliorate the salt affected area. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of NaCl stress on synthesis and catabolism of proline, soluble proteins, carbohydrates and Na+/K+ ratio in A. tricolor and to compare with the salt-sensitive species, Phaseolus vulgaris L. The experiments were designed with six replications. Seedlings of both species were grown hydroponically with 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 mM NaCl. The in vitro activity of the enzyme pyrroline 5-carboxylate synthetase under NaCl stress was higher, while, the activity of proline degrading enzyme - proline oxidase showed a reverse trend i.e., low activity in high NaCl concentrations. Soluble protein content was increased in the shoot of A.tricolor but decreased in P.vulgaris. Roots of both the species showed variation in the protein content. Proline content of shoot and roots increased significantly in all the treatments in the plants. However, A.tricolor showed a higher level. The total carbohydrate also showed a similar trend. High level of NaCl decreased the reduced sugar in shoots and roots of the species. Salt stress increased Na+ significantly and decreased the K+ content in both species. The biochemical variation may be interpreted as differential response of the plants to NaCl stress

References

Bates l S, Waldern R P, Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205-207.

Besford RT. 1978. Effect of replacing nutrient potassium by sodium on uptake and distribution of sodium in tomato plants. Plant Soil 50:399-409.

Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochem., 72:248-254.

Bremberger C, Luttge U. 1992. Dynamics of tonoplast proton pumps and other tonoplast proteins of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. during the induction of Crassulacean acid metabolism. Planta. 188:575-580.

Chen CT, Chen LM, Lin CC, Kao C H. 2001. Regulation of Proline Accumulation in Detached Rice Leaves Exposed to Excess Copper. Plant Sci. 160:283-290.

Claussen W. 2005. Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants. Plant Sci., 168:241-248.

Delauney AJ, Verma DPS. 1993. Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J. 4:215-223.

Dionisio-Sese ML, Tobita S. 2000. Effects of salinity on sodium content and photosynthetic responses of rice seedlings differing in salt tolerance. J. Plant Physiol., 157:54-58.

Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Repers PA, Smith F.1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem., 28:350-356.

Fowler J L.1991. Interaction of salinity and temperature on the germination of Crambe, Agron. J. 83:169-172.

Greenway H, Munns R.1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in non-halophytes, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., 31:149-190.

Huang AHC, Cavalieri A.1979. Proline oxidase and water stress induced proline accumulation in Spinach leaves. Plant Physiol., 63:531-535.

Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Lakshmanan GMA, Sridharan R, Panneerselvam R. 2007e. NaCl as a physiological modulator of proline metabolism and antioxidant potential in Phyllanthus amarus. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 330:806-813.

Jeffries TW, Yang VW, Davis MW.1998. Comparative study of xylanase kinetics using dinitrosalicylic, arsenomolybdate, and ion chromatographic assays. Applied Biochem. and Biotech., 257:70-72.

Kavi Kishor PB, Sangam S, Amrutha RN, Sri Laxmi P, Naidu KR, Rao KRSS, Sreenath Rao, Reddy KJ, Theriappan P Sreenivasulu N.2005. Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: Its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr. Sci., 88:(3)1012-1018.

Murashige T, Skoog F.1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tabacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol., 15:473-479.

Nyagah AW, Musyimi DM. 2009. Effects of sodium chloride solution stress on germination and growth of passion fruits seedlings. J. of Agri. and Biol. Sci., 4:49-53.

Sankar Ganesh K, Baskaran L, Chidambaram ALA, Sundaramoorthy P. 2009. Influence of Chromium Stress on Proline Accumulation in Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) Genotypes. Global J. of Env. Res., 3(2):106-108.

Song SQ, Lei YB, Tian XR. 2005. Proline Metabolism and Cross-Tolerance to Salinity and Heat Stress in Germinating Wheat Seeds. Russ. J. of Plant Physiol., 52:793-800.

Vogel RH, Kopac MJ. 1960. Some Properties of Ornithine γ-Transaminase from Neurospora. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 37:539-540.

Wahome PK, Jesch HH, Grittner I. 2001. Mechanisms of salt stress tolerance in two rose rootstocks: Rosa chinensis ‘Major’ and R. rubiginosa. Sci. Hortic., 87:207-216.

Walter Troll, Keith Cannan R. 1952. A modified photometric ninhydrin method for the analysis of amino and imino acids. J of Biol. Chem., 23:803-811.

Published
2011-08-30
How to Cite
Murugan K, SS, S., SR, H., GS, M., & Krishnan, R. (2011). Biochemical responses and proline metabolism in Amaranthus tricolor L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. under in vitro NaCl Stress. Journal of Research in Biology, 1(4), 299-306. Retrieved from https://ojs.jresearchbiology.com/ojs1/index.php/jrb/article/view/97